conclusion of my seminar's reading this week about lynn's multiplicitous and inorganic body

after reading what he(greg lynn) talked about in article that was almost 20years ago"multiplicitous and inorganic body":::::" ancient greece's symmetry temple of vitruvius's description in On Symmetry;Wittkower's harmonic proportion and again Rowe's 9 square grid; the arguments of Rigid Sense of Geometry of Architecture and relationship of Body(organism)&geometry(Rigid or Not);Thompson's external forces experiment on transformation of nature forms;Deleuze&Guattari's "BwO" and "fold";and emerged Colossus thing from affiliative connections of actual elements: "Statue of Liberty"...and of course many others...

i ve got his idea,which he wanted to say that architecture needs a "suppler body" due to present static alliance between rigid geometry and whole organisms cannot be entirely overcome,in order to achieve a kind of architectural multiplicity.

my notes on this reading...so multicolored...